26 NOV 2018 — Press Release (Response From DOJ)
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW REQUIRING SUBMISSION TO SPECIAL GRAND JURY OF REPORT BY LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE AND 9/11 VICTIM FAMILY MEMBERS OF YET-TO-BE- PROSECUTED 9/11 RELATED FEDERAL CRIMES.
“The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, a nonprofit public interest organization, announces its receipt of a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in response to the Lawyers’ Committee’s April 10, 2018 Petition and July 30, 2018 Amended Petition demanding that the U.S. Attorney present to a Special Grand Jury extensive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7). The U.S. Attorney, in his November 7, 2018 letter to the Lawyers’ Committee, stated: “We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 as they relate to your submissions” (emphasis added). ” (Complete PR)
9/11 Truth Gets A Grand Jury – Commentary by James Corbett and James Evan Pilato
Lawyers Committee For 911 Inquiry
Press Conference April 10, 2018 of Lawyers’ Committee For 9/11 Inquiry
Press Conference April 10, 2018 of Lawyers’ Committee For 9/11 Inquiry reporting their delivering earlier in the day, of the petition to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the US Department of Justice demanding an investigation by a Special Grand Jury of the collapses of the 3 WTC buildings.
The petition insists there is abundant evidence the collapses were result of explosives and incendiaries placed in the building months before 9/11/01, like the section starting at page 16 entitled:
“Evidence that Pre-Planted Explosive and/or Incendiary Devices Were Detonated and Ignited at the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001 is Broad and Conclusive”
Included with the 52 page document delivered to the US Attorney was a thumb drive with 57 exhibits, journal articles, videos, etc., which the Lawyers have provided links to online Exhibits:
The response from Michael J. Heimbach’s office of counter-terrorism is based on Richard Gage’s 2008 presentation, “Blueprint for Truth” under provision of 18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason.
The key content of the reply is Heimbach’s evaluation of the evidence:
“Mr. Gage presents an interesting theory backed by thorough research and analysis”
Please review a previous post on this story
# # #